Australia vs Lithuania: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Australia
7.8%
in 2025
Lithuania
7.9%
in 2025
Australia rank
153rd
Lithuania rank
151st
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Australia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 7.9% against 7.8% in Australia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lithuania ahead.
Australia ranks 153rd and Lithuania ranks 151st of 187 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.4% | 14.6% | 4.1% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 8.8% | 13.5% | 4.7% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 7.9% | 8.1% | 0.2% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 7.9% | 8.1% | 0.2% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Australia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 7.9% against 7.8% in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Australia and Lithuania?
- 0.1%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lithuania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Lithuania rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Australia ranks 153rd and Lithuania ranks 151st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.