Iceland vs Luxembourg: Unemployed population — Unemployment

Iceland
10.53 Persons
in 2025
Luxembourg
22.75 Persons
in 2025
Iceland rank
35th
Luxembourg rank
34th

Unemployed population — Unemployment over time

  • Iceland
  • Luxembourg
0510152025196419942025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 22.75 Persons against 10.53 Persons in Iceland, a difference of 12.22 Persons.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Iceland ranks 35th and Luxembourg ranks 34th of 35 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 3.66 Persons 4.55 Persons 0.895 Persons Luxembourg
2000s 5.42 Persons 8 Persons 2.58 Persons Luxembourg
2010s 8.75 Persons 14.99 Persons 6.24 Persons Luxembourg
2020s 9.87 Persons 19.3 Persons 9.43 Persons Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher unemployed population — unemployment, Iceland or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 22.75 Persons against 10.53 Persons in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in unemployed population — unemployment between Iceland and Luxembourg?
12.22 Persons, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Luxembourg?
28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Luxembourg rank globally for unemployed population — unemployment?
Iceland ranks 35th and Luxembourg ranks 34th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Unemployed population — Unemployment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Luxembourg: Unemployed population — Unemployment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/unemployed-population-unemployment/iceland/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/unemployed-population-unemployment/iceland/luxembourg/">Iceland vs Luxembourg: Unemployed population — Unemployment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Unemployed population — Unemployment
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
48 places, 2,160 data points, 1955–2025
Last refreshed

The infra-annual dataflow on the unemployed population is a subset of the infra-annual labour statistics database, which contains predominantly monthly and quarterly statistics on the unemployed population by age groups (15+, 15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 15-64 and 15-74 where available) and sex and associated statistical methodological information and associated statistical methodological information, for the OECD member countries and for selected other economies. Chile, Costa Rica, and the United Kingdom publish Labour Force Survey (LFS) data using a rolling quarter methodology. The OECD treats the middle month of the rolling quarter as the reference month. As a result, the publication of monthly LFS data for these countries may be delayed by one month or more relative to the OECD reference month. The unemployed are persons in their working age who, in the reference period, do not have a job; are available for work; and, have taken specific steps to find a job. The infra-annual labour statistics compiled for all OECD member countries, are drawn from Labour Force Surveys based on definition provided by the 19th Conference of Labour Statisticians in 2013. The uniform application of these definitions across all OECD member countries results in estimates that are internationally comparable.