Luxembourg vs Russia: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Luxembourg
- Russia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 28.23 against 27.45 in Russia, a difference of 0.78.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Russia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 22nd and Russia ranks 25th of 86 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.8 | 39.82 | 1.02 | Russia |
| 2010s | 34.32 | 30.03 | 4.3 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Luxembourg or Russia?
- Luxembourg, at 28.23 against 27.45 in Russia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Luxembourg and Russia?
- 0.78, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Russia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Luxembourg and Russia rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Luxembourg ranks 22nd and Russia ranks 25th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.