Guatemala vs Pakistan: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Guatemala
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 4.73 against 3.15 in Guatemala, a difference of 1.58.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.5 times Guatemala's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 84th and Pakistan ranks 81st of 86 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.48 | 6.37 | 2.9 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 2.82 | 4.73 | 1.91 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Guatemala or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 4.73 against 3.15 in Guatemala as of 2016.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Guatemala and Pakistan?
- 1.58, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Pakistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Guatemala and Pakistan rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Guatemala ranks 84th and Pakistan ranks 81st of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.