Finland vs Kazakhstan: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Finland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 58.83 against 46.92 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 11.91.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 4th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 86 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.46 | 37.58 | 34.89 | Finland |
| 2010s | 68.27 | 43.77 | 24.5 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Finland or Kazakhstan?
- Finland, at 58.83 against 46.92 in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 11.91, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Finland ranks 4th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.