Estonia vs Lithuania: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Estonia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 7.36 against 6.02 in Estonia, a difference of 1.34.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 80th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 86 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.14 | 11.44 | 2.29 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 5.82 | 8.31 | 2.49 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Estonia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 7.36 against 6.02 in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Estonia and Lithuania?
- 1.34, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Lithuania rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Estonia ranks 80th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.