Croatia vs Romania: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Croatia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 21.39 against 20.76 in Croatia, a difference of 0.63.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Romania ahead.
Croatia ranks 38th and Romania ranks 36th of 86 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.86 | 34.85 | 3.99 | Romania |
| 2010s | 25.81 | 24.43 | 1.38 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Croatia or Romania?
- Romania, at 21.39 against 20.76 in Croatia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Croatia and Romania?
- 0.63, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Croatia and Romania rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Croatia ranks 38th and Romania ranks 36th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.