Colombia vs Estonia: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Colombia
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 6.02 against 4.65 in Colombia, a difference of 1.37.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.3 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Estonia ahead.
Colombia ranks 82nd and Estonia ranks 80th of 86 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6 | 6.9 | 3.31 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 4.85 | 5.82 | 0.9655 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Colombia or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 6.02 against 4.65 in Colombia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Colombia and Estonia?
- 1.37, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Estonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Colombia and Estonia rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Colombia ranks 82nd and Estonia ranks 80th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.