Botswana vs Luxembourg: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Botswana
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 29.96 against 28.23 in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.73.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Botswana ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 86 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.72 | 36.78 | 19.06 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 28.88 | 30.73 | 1.85 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Botswana or Luxembourg?
- Botswana, at 29.96 against 28.23 in Luxembourg as of 2020.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Botswana and Luxembourg?
- 1.73, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Luxembourg rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Botswana ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.