Bolivia vs Slovakia: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Bolivia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 12.04 against 11.08 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.96.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Slovakia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 61st and Slovakia ranks 64th of 86 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.01 | 26.41 | 1.4 | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 15.01 | 12.16 | 2.85 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Bolivia or Slovakia?
- Bolivia, at 12.04 against 11.08 in Slovakia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Bolivia and Slovakia?
- 0.96, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Slovakia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Slovakia rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Bolivia ranks 61st and Slovakia ranks 64th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.