Austria vs Hong Kong, China: Trade union density rate
Trade union density rate over time
- Austria
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Austria currently reports 26.24 against 26.06 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 27th and Hong Kong, China ranks 28th of 86 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.5 | 22.83 | 9.67 | Austria |
| 2010s | 27.84 | 24.94 | 2.89 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade union density rate, Austria or Hong Kong, China?
- Austria, at 26.24 against 26.06 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trade union density rate between Austria and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.18, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hong Kong, China?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Austria and Hong Kong, China rank globally for trade union density rate?
- Austria ranks 27th and Hong Kong, China ranks 28th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Trade union density rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trade union is defined as a workers' organization constituted for the purpose of furthering and defending the interests of workers. This trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees. For the purpose of this indicator in particular, trade union membership excludes union members who are not in paid employment (self-employed, unemployed, retired, etc.), unless otherwise stated in the notes. The statistics presented in this table result from an ILO data compilation effort (including an annual questionnaire and numerous special enquiries), with contributions from J. Visser. For more information, refer to the Industrial Relations data (IRdata) database description.