Eritrea vs World: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled)
Eritrea
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2011
World
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eritrea rank
4th
World rank
2nd
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) over time
- Eritrea
- World
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in World, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 19.6 times World's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 4th and World ranks 2nd of 185 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled), Eritrea or World?
- Eritrea, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in World as of 2011.
- What is the difference in total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) between Eritrea and World?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and World?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and World rank globally for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled)?
- Eritrea ranks 4th and World ranks 2nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.