Chagai vs Eritrea: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled)
Chagai
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eritrea
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Chagai rank
1st
Eritrea rank
4th
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled) over time
- Chagai
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Chagai, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 109.6 times Chagai's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Chagai ranks 1st and Eritrea ranks 4th of 1 regions.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chagai | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled), Chagai or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Chagai as of 2011.
- What is the difference in total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled) between Chagai and Eritrea?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Eritrea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Chagai and Eritrea rank globally for total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ilo modelled)?
- Chagai ranks 1st and Eritrea ranks 4th of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.