Latvia vs Viet Nam: Time-related underemployment rate (current ILO definition - ICLS19)
Time-related underemployment rate (current ILO definition - ICLS19) over time
- Latvia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.48 against 1.79 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.69.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 38th and Viet Nam ranks 41st of 59 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (current ilo definition - icls19), Latvia or Viet Nam?
- Latvia, at 2.48 against 1.79 in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (current ilo definition - icls19) between Latvia and Viet Nam?
- 0.69, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Viet Nam rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (current ilo definition - icls19)?
- Latvia ranks 38th and Viet Nam ranks 41st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (current ILO definition - ICLS19) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series includes only countries for which the 19th ICLS definitions are applied. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For more information, refer to the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database description.