Peru vs Rwanda: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Peru
0 units per person
in 2025
Rwanda
0 units per person
in 2025
Peru rank
19th
Rwanda rank
17th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Peru
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Peru, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.
Peru ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 186 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Peru or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Peru and Rwanda?
- 0 units per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Peru and Rwanda rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Peru ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.