Namibia vs Turkey: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Namibia
0 units per person
in 2025
Turkey
0 units per person
in 2025
Namibia rank
56th
Turkey rank
54th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Namibia
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 56th and Turkey ranks 54th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Turkey in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Namibia or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Namibia and Turkey?
- 0 units per person, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turkey?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Turkey rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Namibia ranks 56th and Turkey ranks 54th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.