Morocco vs Qatar: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Morocco
0 units per person
in 2025
Qatar
0 units per person
in 2025
Morocco rank
48th
Qatar rank
49th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Morocco
- Qatar
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Qatar, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 48th and Qatar ranks 49th of 186 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Morocco |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Morocco |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Morocco or Qatar?
- Morocco, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Morocco and Qatar?
- 0 units per person, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Qatar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Morocco and Qatar rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Morocco ranks 48th and Qatar ranks 49th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.