Libya vs Portugal: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Libya
0 units per person
in 2025
Portugal
0 units per person
in 2025
Libya rank
71st
Portugal rank
74th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Libya
- Portugal
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 71st and Portugal ranks 74th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Libya or Portugal?
- Libya, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Libya and Portugal?
- 0 units per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Portugal?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Portugal rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Libya ranks 71st and Portugal ranks 74th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.