Liberia vs Moldova: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Liberia
0 units per person
in 2025
Moldova
0 units per person
in 2025
Liberia rank
128th
Moldova rank
127th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Liberia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Liberia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Moldova ahead.
Liberia ranks 128th and Moldova ranks 127th of 186 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Moldova |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Moldova |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Liberia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Liberia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Liberia and Moldova?
- 0 units per person, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Moldova?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Liberia and Moldova rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Liberia ranks 128th and Moldova ranks 127th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.