Latvia vs Vietnam: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Latvia
0 units per person
in 2025
Vietnam
0 units per person
in 2025
Latvia rank
131st
Vietnam rank
133rd
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Latvia
- Vietnam
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Vietnam, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Vietnam ahead.
Latvia ranks 131st and Vietnam ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Vietnam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Latvia or Vietnam?
- Latvia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Latvia and Vietnam?
- 0 units per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Vietnam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Vietnam rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Latvia ranks 131st and Vietnam ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.