Laos vs Romania: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Laos
0 units per person
in 2025
Romania
0 units per person
in 2025
Laos rank
159th
Romania rank
158th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Laos
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Laos, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 159th and Romania ranks 158th of 186 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Romania |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Romania |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Laos or Romania?
- Romania, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Laos and Romania?
- 0 units per person, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Romania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Romania rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Laos ranks 159th and Romania ranks 158th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.