Laos vs Pakistan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Laos
0 units per person
in 2025
Pakistan
0 units per person
in 2025
Laos rank
159th
Pakistan rank
160th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Laos
- Pakistan
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 159th and Pakistan ranks 160th of 186 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Laos |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Laos |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Laos or Pakistan?
- Laos, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Pakistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Laos and Pakistan?
- 0 units per person, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Pakistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Pakistan rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Laos ranks 159th and Pakistan ranks 160th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.