Japan vs Oman: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Japan
0 units per person
in 2025
Oman
0 units per person
in 2025
Japan rank
108th
Oman rank
111th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Japan
- Oman
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Oman, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 108th and Oman ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Japan or Oman?
- Japan, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Japan and Oman?
- 0 units per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Oman?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Japan and Oman rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Japan ranks 108th and Oman ranks 111th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.