Italy vs Tonga: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Italy
0 units per person
in 2025
Tonga
0 units per person
in 2025
Italy rank
125th
Tonga rank
122nd
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Italy
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Italy, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tonga ahead.
Italy ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Tonga |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Italy |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Italy or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Italy as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Italy and Tonga?
- 0 units per person, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Tonga?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Italy and Tonga rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Italy ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.