Ireland vs Panama: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Ireland
0 units per person
in 2025
Panama
0 units per person
in 2025
Ireland rank
27th
Panama rank
24th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Ireland
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Ireland, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Panama ahead.
Ireland ranks 27th and Panama ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Panama |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ireland |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Ireland or Panama?
- Panama, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Ireland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Ireland and Panama?
- 0 units per person, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Panama?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Ireland and Panama rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Ireland ranks 27th and Panama ranks 24th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.