Iraq vs Nepal: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Iraq
0 units per person
in 2025
Nepal
0 units per person
in 2025
Iraq rank
96th
Nepal rank
95th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Iraq
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Iraq, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 96th and Nepal ranks 95th of 186 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Iraq or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Iraq as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Iraq and Nepal?
- 0 units per person, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Nepal?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Iraq and Nepal rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Iraq ranks 96th and Nepal ranks 95th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.