India vs Japan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
India
0 units per person
in 2025
Japan
0 units per person
in 2025
India rank
106th
Japan rank
108th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- India
- Japan
How they compare
India currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Japan, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.
India ranks 106th and Japan ranks 108th of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, India or Japan?
- India, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between India and Japan?
- 0 units per person, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Japan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do India and Japan rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- India ranks 106th and Japan ranks 108th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.