Guam vs Paraguay: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Guam
0 units per person
in 2025
Paraguay
0 units per person
in 2025
Guam rank
97th
Paraguay rank
94th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Guam
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Guam, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 97th and Paraguay ranks 94th of 186 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Guam or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Guam and Paraguay?
- 0 units per person, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Paraguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Guam and Paraguay rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Guam ranks 97th and Paraguay ranks 94th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.