Ghana vs Namibia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Ghana
0 units per person
in 2025
Namibia
0 units per person
in 2025
Ghana rank
59th
Namibia rank
56th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Ghana
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Ghana, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.
Ghana ranks 59th and Namibia ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Ghana or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Ghana and Namibia?
- 0 units per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Namibia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Namibia rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Ghana ranks 59th and Namibia ranks 56th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.