France vs Gambia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
France
0 units per person
in 2025
Gambia
0 units per person
in 2025
France rank
33rd
Gambia rank
31st
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- France
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in France, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gambia ahead.
France ranks 33rd and Gambia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Gambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | France |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, France or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in France as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between France and Gambia?
- 0 units per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Gambia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do France and Gambia rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- France ranks 33rd and Gambia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.