Fiji vs Italy: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Fiji
0 units per person
in 2025
Italy
0 units per person
in 2025
Fiji rank
124th
Italy rank
125th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Fiji
- Italy
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Italy, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 124th and Italy ranks 125th of 186 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Italy |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Italy |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Fiji or Italy?
- Fiji, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Italy as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Fiji and Italy?
- 0 units per person, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Italy?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Italy rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Fiji ranks 124th and Italy ranks 125th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.