Eswatini vs Gabon: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Eswatini
0 units per person
in 2025
Gabon
0 units per person
in 2025
Eswatini rank
83rd
Gabon rank
81st
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Eswatini
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 83rd and Gabon ranks 81st of 186 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Eswatini or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Eswatini and Gabon?
- 0 units per person, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gabon?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Gabon rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Eswatini ranks 83rd and Gabon ranks 81st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.