Egypt vs Samoa: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Egypt
0 units per person
in 2025
Samoa
0 units per person
in 2025
Egypt rank
184th
Samoa rank
183rd
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Egypt
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Egypt, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.3 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 184th and Samoa ranks 183rd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Egypt |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Egypt or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Egypt as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Egypt and Samoa?
- 0 units per person, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Samoa?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Samoa rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Egypt ranks 184th and Samoa ranks 183rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.