Congo vs Vanuatu: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Congo
0 units per person
in 2025
Vanuatu
0 units per person
in 2025
Congo rank
45th
Vanuatu rank
42nd
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Congo
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Congo, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 45th and Vanuatu ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Congo or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Congo and Vanuatu?
- 0 units per person, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Vanuatu?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Vanuatu rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Congo ranks 45th and Vanuatu ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.