Chile vs Niger: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Chile
0 units per person
in 2025
Niger
0 units per person
in 2025
Chile rank
43rd
Niger rank
41st
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Chile
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Chile, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 43rd and Niger ranks 41st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0001 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Chile or Niger?
- Niger, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Chile and Niger?
- 0 units per person, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Niger?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Niger rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Chile ranks 43rd and Niger ranks 41st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.