Burundi vs Georgia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Burundi
0 units per person
in 2025
Georgia
0 units per person
in 2025
Burundi rank
51st
Georgia rank
53rd
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Burundi
- Georgia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Georgia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 51st and Georgia ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Burundi |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Burundi |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Burundi or Georgia?
- Burundi, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Burundi and Georgia?
- 0 units per person, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Georgia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Georgia rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Burundi ranks 51st and Georgia ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.