Bhutan vs Malaysia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Bhutan
0 units per person
in 2025
Malaysia
0 units per person
in 2025
Bhutan rank
143rd
Malaysia rank
141st
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Bhutan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 143rd and Malaysia ranks 141st of 186 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Bhutan or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Bhutan and Malaysia?
- 0 units per person, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Malaysia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Malaysia rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Bhutan ranks 143rd and Malaysia ranks 141st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.