Bhutan vs Estonia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Bhutan
0 units per person
in 2025
Estonia
0 units per person
in 2025
Bhutan rank
143rd
Estonia rank
140th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Bhutan
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 143rd and Estonia ranks 140th of 186 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Bhutan or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Bhutan and Estonia?
- 0 units per person, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Estonia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Estonia rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Bhutan ranks 143rd and Estonia ranks 140th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.