Belgium vs Uganda: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Belgium
0 units per person
in 2025
Uganda
0 units per person
in 2025
Belgium rank
77th
Uganda rank
78th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Belgium
- Uganda
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Uganda, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Belgium or Uganda?
- Belgium, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Belgium and Uganda?
- 0 units per person, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Uganda rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Belgium ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.