Bahrain vs Zimbabwe: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per
Bahrain
0 units per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 units per person
in 2025
Bahrain rank
100th
Zimbabwe rank
99th
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per over time
- Bahrain
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bahrain, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 186 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | 0 units per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per, Bahrain or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bahrain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per between Bahrain and Zimbabwe?
- 0 units per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bahrain and Zimbabwe rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Bahrain ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.