New Zealand vs Sweden: Strictness of employment protection — Temporary contracts

New Zealand
1 0-6 scale
in 2025
Sweden
0.9375 0-6 scale
in 2025
New Zealand rank
31st
Sweden rank
34th

Strictness of employment protection — Temporary contracts over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sweden
01234198520052025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1 0-6 scale against 0.9375 0-6 scale in Sweden, a difference of 0.0625 0-6 scale.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

New Zealand ranks 31st and Sweden ranks 34th of 41 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.375 0-6 scale 2.33 0-6 scale 1.96 0-6 scale Sweden
2000s 0.9375 0-6 scale 1.31 0-6 scale 0.375 0-6 scale Sweden
2010s 1 0-6 scale 0.8125 0-6 scale 0.1875 0-6 scale New Zealand
2020s 1 0-6 scale 0.875 0-6 scale 0.125 0-6 scale New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher strictness of employment protection — temporary contracts, New Zealand or Sweden?
New Zealand, at 1 0-6 scale against 0.9375 0-6 scale in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in strictness of employment protection — temporary contracts between New Zealand and Sweden?
0.0625 0-6 scale, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for strictness of employment protection — temporary contracts?
New Zealand ranks 31st and Sweden ranks 34th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Strictness of employment protection — Temporary contracts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sweden: Strictness of employment protection — Temporary contracts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-temporary-contracts/new-zealand/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-temporary-contracts/new-zealand/sweden/">New Zealand vs Sweden: Strictness of employment protection — Temporary contracts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Strictness of employment protection — Temporary contracts
Unit
0-6 scale
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
50 places, 1,336 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD indicators of employment protection are synthetic indicators of the strictness of regulation on dismissals and the use of temporary contracts. For each year, indicators refer to regulation in force on the 1st of January. For more information and full methodology, see OECD Indicators of Employment Protection webpage Last data update: May 2022 OECD statistics contact: ELS.Contact@oecd.org