Finland vs New Zealand: Share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job

Finland
59.04 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
New Zealand
57.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Finland rank
4th
New Zealand rank
5th

Share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
0204060199720112025

How they compare

Finland currently reports 59.04 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 57.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in New Zealand, a difference of 1.68 Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 5th of 37 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
2010s 59.3 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 57.16 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 2.14 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Finland
2020s 58.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 57.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 1.01 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job, Finland or New Zealand?
Finland, at 59.04 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 57.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job between Finland and New Zealand?
1.68 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job?
Finland ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 5th of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Zealand: Share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-women-in-temporary-employment-by-permanency-of-the-job/finland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-women-in-temporary-employment-by-permanency-of-the-job/finland/new-zealand/">Finland vs New Zealand: Share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of women in temporary employment by permanency of the job
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,548 data points, 1980–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains the share of women in temporary employment with standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total). Data are reported for employees. Temporary employees are wage and salary workers whose job has a pre-determined termination date as opposed to permanent employees whose job is of unlimited duration. They include: i) persons with a seasonal job; ii) persons engaged by an employment agency or business and hired out to a third party for carrying out a “work mission”; iii) persons with specific training contracts (including apprentices, trainees, research assistants, probationary period of a contract, etc.). Country-specific exceptions to this generic definition may be found in LFS_NOTES_SOURCES. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates