Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of

Trinidad and Tobago
6.75
in 2024
Zimbabwe
7.57
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago rank
61st
Zimbabwe rank
59th

SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Zimbabwe
0246810201420192024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 7.57 against 6.75 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.82.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 73 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 7.44 7.55 0.109 Zimbabwe
2020s 6.91 8.33 1.43 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg indicator 9.2.2: manufacturing employment as a proportion of, Trinidad and Tobago or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 7.57 against 6.75 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg indicator 9.2.2: manufacturing employment as a proportion of between Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
0.82, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe rank globally for sdg indicator 9.2.2: manufacturing employment as a proportion of?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 73 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (current ILO definition - ICLS19). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-9-2-2-manufacturing-employment-as-a-proportion-of-total-employment-current/trinidad-and-tobago/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-indicator-9-2-2-manufacturing-employment-as-a-proportion-of-total-employment-current/trinidad-and-tobago/zimbabwe/">Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (current ILO definition - ICLS19)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
73 places, 725 data points, 2014–2025
Last refreshed

Data may differ from nationally reported figures and the Global SDG Indicators Database due to differences in sources and/or reference years. This indicator conveys the share of employment in manufacturing. Employment in manufacturing is defined based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC). Employment refers to all persons of working age who, during a specified brief period, were in paid employment (whether at work or with a job but not at work) or in self-employment (whether at work or with an enterprise but not at work). This indicator is calculated based on data on employment by sex and economic activity. For more information, refer to the Labour Market-related SDG Indicators (ILOSDG) database description.