Sao Tome and Principe vs Vietnam: SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized
Sao Tome and Principe
2
in 2025
Vietnam
2
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe rank
42nd
Vietnam rank
42nd
SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Vietnam
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 2 against 2 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Vietnam ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd and Vietnam ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2.25 | 2 | 0.25 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized, Sao Tome and Principe or Vietnam?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 2 against 2 in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized between Sao Tome and Principe and Vietnam?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Vietnam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Vietnam rank globally for sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd and Vietnam ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDG 8.b.1 tracks whether a country has a national youth employment strategy, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy, and how far it has been implemented. Scores run from 0, meaning no strategy or steps taken, through 1 (under development) and 2 (formally adopted), to 3 (fully operational).