Malaysia vs New Zealand: SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized
Malaysia
3
in 2025
New Zealand
3
in 2025
Malaysia rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized over time
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3 against 3 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 75 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized, Malaysia or New Zealand?
- Malaysia, at 3 against 3 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized between Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and New Zealand rank globally for sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDG 8.b.1 tracks whether a country has a national youth employment strategy, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy, and how far it has been implemented. Scores run from 0, meaning no strategy or steps taken, through 1 (under development) and 2 (formally adopted), to 3 (fully operational).