Latvia vs Mexico: SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized
Latvia
3
in 2025
Mexico
3
in 2025
Latvia rank
1st
Mexico rank
1st
SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized over time
- Latvia
- Mexico
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3 against 3 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 75 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized, Latvia or Mexico?
- Latvia, at 3 against 3 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized between Latvia and Mexico?
- 0, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mexico?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Mexico rank globally for sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized?
- Latvia ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDG 8.b.1 tracks whether a country has a national youth employment strategy, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy, and how far it has been implemented. Scores run from 0, meaning no strategy or steps taken, through 1 (under development) and 2 (formally adopted), to 3 (fully operational).