Japan vs East Timor: SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized
Japan
2
in 2025
East Timor
2
in 2025
Japan rank
42nd
East Timor rank
42nd
SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized over time
- Japan
- East Timor
How they compare
Japan currently reports 2 against 2 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 42nd and East Timor ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized, Japan or East Timor?
- Japan, at 2 against 2 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized between Japan and East Timor?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Japan and East Timor rank globally for sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized?
- Japan ranks 42nd and East Timor ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDG 8.b.1 tracks whether a country has a national youth employment strategy, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy, and how far it has been implemented. Scores run from 0, meaning no strategy or steps taken, through 1 (under development) and 2 (formally adopted), to 3 (fully operational).