Cook Islands vs Sri Lanka: SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized
Cook Islands
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Cook Islands rank
70th
Sri Lanka rank
70th
SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized over time
- Cook Islands
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 75 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 1 | 1.75 | 0.75 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized, Cook Islands or Sri Lanka?
- Cook Islands, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized between Cook Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Cook Islands and Sri Lanka rank globally for sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized?
- Cook Islands ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDG 8.b.1 tracks whether a country has a national youth employment strategy, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy, and how far it has been implemented. Scores run from 0, meaning no strategy or steps taken, through 1 (under development) and 2 (formally adopted), to 3 (fully operational).