Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized
Congo
2
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
2
in 2025
Congo rank
42nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
42nd
SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized over time
- Congo
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2 against 2 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2.25 | 0.25 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized, Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Congo, at 2 against 2 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized?
- Congo ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDG 8.b.1 tracks whether a country has a national youth employment strategy, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy, and how far it has been implemented. Scores run from 0, meaning no strategy or steps taken, through 1 (under development) and 2 (formally adopted), to 3 (fully operational).