Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized
Belarus
3
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina
3
in 2025
Belarus rank
1st
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized over time
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 3 against 3 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 1st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st of 75 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.6 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Belarus, at 3 against 3 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for sdg indicator 8.b.1: existence of a developed and operationalized?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDG 8.b.1 tracks whether a country has a national youth employment strategy, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy, and how far it has been implemented. Scores run from 0, meaning no strategy or steps taken, through 1 (under development) and 2 (formally adopted), to 3 (fully operational).